A dating profile analyzer that tells you what to change

Upload the photos your profile is running. Each photo comes back with where it goes on your profile, six ratings, and what to improve.

Free, no account.
Deleted within a day.
It rates the photo, not you.

Check your photos free in the app

No matches is one bit of information

A profile that is not working tells you exactly one thing: it is not working. Nobody explains a pass, nothing in the app attributes the outcome to a photo or an order or a line of text, and the only number you can see is the one you are unhappy with. So the usual repair is to change everything at once, and if it improves you still do not know which change did it.

An outside read is worth having because it does the attribution. It goes through the photos you are actually running, each judged entirely on its own, and comes back with named faults against specific photos. That is something you can act on before you next open the app. Often the list comes back empty, which is a good result rather than a failure. You will not agree with all of it, and you do not have to: you can see what it is pointing at and decide.

What actually happens

You upload the photos you are already using, or the ones you are deciding between. Every photo is judged on its own, never against your others. Each photo comes back with where it goes on your profile, six ratings, and what to improve.

Where it goes runs from use this first to do not use this one. The three answers in between are use this second, somewhere in the middle, and keep this for later. A photo where your face is small can still belong in the middle. It is placed there rather than marked down for it.

Each rating is Strong, Solid, Fair or Weak. Two of the six ratings are measured from your file. AI looking at the photo judges the other four. When a photo does not show enough to judge something, the rating says so. It reads Not clear enough, instead of a confident word nobody can trust.

Can they see your face — measured from your file.
Light and focus — measured from your file.
What is around you — judged by AI looking at the photo.
Eyes and posture — judged by AI looking at the photo.
How natural it looks — judged by AI looking at the photo.
Something to ask about — judged by AI looking at the photo.

It names the fault, not a number

A score out of ten tells you nothing you can act on. So there is no score here, no number and no percentage. What to improve is at most three short lines, written about your photo rather than picked from a fixed set.

Often there is nothing worth changing, and the list comes back empty. That is a good result, not a failure. A line appears only when the fault costs the photo something real.

Some faults can be corrected in the photo you already have. A correction is offered when a rating is Fair or Weak and the fault can honestly be corrected. It can also decline, and say that a new photo would serve you better. The check is free. Correcting a photo costs one credit.

People are poor judges of their own photos

There is published evidence that you are the wrong person to choose your own pictures. In a 2017 paper in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, White, Sutherland and Burton reported that people selected worse images of themselves than strangers selected for them, and that this held when the images were being chosen for a dating profile. Knowing your own face very well appears to be part of the problem rather than the fix.

That is an argument for getting an outside opinion. It is not evidence that this check is correct, and we are not going to present it as such: the finding is that self-selection is unreliable, not that any given tool is accurate. Read the findings, keep the ones you can see for yourself once they are pointed out, and drop the rest. The value is having something outside your own head to argue with.

What it will not do

It reads what is visible in a photograph. It does not know you, and it is not judging you.
Every photo is judged on its own. We never compare your photos to each other.
It cannot tell you whether a specific person will like you, and nothing can.
It has no access to your dating app account, your match count or your likes.
The check is free and it does not ask for a card.

Once you know which photo is the problem

Knowing a photo has to go is useful on its own. It is more useful when the replacement is one you can actually get, which is the part generating is for: your own face, in the photo your profile is short of.

Generate your dating photos

Questions

Do I get a score out of ten?

No. There is no score and no number. Each photo comes back with where it goes on your profile, six ratings, and what to improve. Each rating is Strong, Solid, Fair or Weak. Where it goes runs from use this first to do not use this one. A number would compress all of that into something you cannot act on.

Does it read my bio and my prompts as well?

No. The check reads photos, and photos are all it claims to read. If the words are the part you are stuck on, the writer on this site is a different tool: it works from what you tell it and will never invent a job, a place or a history you do not have. Nothing here critiques a bio you have already written.

What do I need to start?

Just the photos. Two photos a day run right on this page without an account. Twelve a day with a free one, enough for a whole profile and then whatever you replace. There is no card and the check does not ask for one.

Can it tell me why I am not getting matches?

It can tell you what is visibly wrong with the photos you are showing. It cannot tell you why any particular person passed, because that depends on things no photo contains: who else is nearby, what they are looking for, what they are doing at the time. Anything that claims otherwise is guessing.